ABSTRACT
Objective To compare GM260 portable blood glucose meter and AU5821 automatic biochemical analyzer in order to prove the accuracy of GM260 and its applicability for clinical use.Methods Totally 20 pieces of EDTA-K2 anticoagulative specimens and 23 GM260 meters were numbered,and each specimen underwent examinations by both GM260 and AU5821,then the bias between the two kinds of devices was calculated.Results The maximal bias between GM260 and AU5821 was 0.47 mmol/L and all the meters had the bias between-0.83 and 0.83 mmol/L in case of 5 specimens with the glucose concentration less than 4.2 mmol/L;the maximal bias between GM260 and AU5821 was 18.07％ and all the meters had the bias between-20％ and 20％ in case of 15 specimens with the glucose concentration not less than 4.2 mmol/L;the examination results by GM260 all accorded with industrial standard.The results by GM260 were lower than those by AU5821,and the maximal negative deviation was-13.43％.Conclusion Portable blood glucose meter can only be used for screening,and automatic biochemical analyzer is the preferred device for diabetes diagnosis.